A bitter High Court dispute has broken out concerning possible neighbours more than the development of the wall in a coastal web site inside of a north Dublin suburb, a case which has captivated countrywide interest adhering to an Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on a proposed relatives home at Sutton Strand, in which allegations of planning breaches, environmental considerations, and very long-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled into your courts. The Irish Situations short article about René Collier and the Irish Occasions write-up about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what began as a local disagreement has developed into a extremely publicised legal struggle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing over construction works at the website on Dublin Road, Sutton, where Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a health care provider and a company director respectively, look for to make their relatives household. The situation is now emblematic of wider disputes together Ireland’s coastline, exactly where improvement pressures collide with environmental protections and the sensitivities of founded inhabitants. According to the Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall remaining created by their potential neighbours goes over and above the boundaries permitted less than setting up permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both residents of Dublin Highway, assert that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the conditions of their planning permission by developing a wall over and above the boundaries in their web page, bringing about an encroachment on a Distinctive Space of Conservation. The SAC designation is central on the dispute, as such regions are issue to rigid controls less than European and Irish environmental law. Inside their court docket filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even small encroachments might have Long lasting ecological penalties, notably inside of a sensitive coastal natural environment such as Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They can be in breach of their scheduling authorization, and say the wall, which can be partly designed, is in the correct place. Their authorized crew has characterised the motion being an try and hold off or frustrate a lawful improvement. The few accuse litigants of searching for to halt homebuilding to be able to maintain their perspective, an allegation which has been recurring in court docket and referenced in protection of the case. This accusation goes to the heart of many coastal organizing disputes, exactly where views of The ocean are both very prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described dramatic efforts by the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded as a result of ocean in storm to photograph the site, Based on sworn proof referenced inside the Irish Moments. In one account, Rene Collier waded via midsection-superior drinking water for the duration of a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Instances, a picture which has given that turn out to be emblematic of the depth in the dispute. These steps were not basically symbolic; they ended up intended to Assemble visual proof from the wall’s posture relative to tidal traces and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the positioning in the sea Irish Situations documented, describing how The 2 Guys entered the h2o in the course of severe weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading as a result of storm water to photograph the location became Among the most striking descriptions to emerge from courtroom reporting. The Irish Times report about accountant Paul Feely pointed out that this sort of steps were being cited to show the plaintiffs’ perception which the wall prolonged into an area impacted by tidal movement, strengthening their argument the SAC was remaining encroached upon.
The activities at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 ended up included in detail through the nationwide press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Periods 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Situations January 27 2026 turned widely searched phrases as visitors sought to grasp the history and implications of the situation. On that day, the High Court listened to further more submissions on regardless of whether interim orders must be granted to halt development pending a complete hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a crucial second inside the legal timeline.
In the core of the dispute is a disagreement over boundaries, preparing compliance, and intent. René Collier and Rene Collier and Paul Feely Paul Feely preserve which the wall, as manufactured, goes further than what was authorised and intrudes into secured land. They argue that this is simply not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by occupation, is described as meticulous in his assessment of arranging documents, maps, and conditions hooked up for the permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both equally stressed that their motion is inspired by concern for environmental security and adherence to arranging law. They reject statements that the case is about preserving A non-public see, insisting instead that it is about making sure that progress at Sutton Strand respects legal and ecological boundaries. In affidavits, they've explained their lengthy-standing link to the area and their recognition of its environmental sensitivity.
On the other aspect, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed them selves as a couple only attempting to produce a family members property in accordance Using the legislation. They deny which the wall encroaches on a Specific Region of Conservation and say that each one is effective are already performed based on Skilled assistance and approved programs. Their attorneys have argued the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and the remarkable steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, together with entering the sea throughout a storm, usually do not change the underlying details.
The case has also raised broader questions on how planning disputes are resolved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court dispute over development of wall at coastal web site is becoming a shorthand description for the predicament a large number of observers see as ever more prevalent. As sea degrees rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the precise delineation between non-public land, community foreshore, and protected habitats is becoming extra contentious.
The Irish Periods short article about René Collier famous that the businessman experienced Formerly been linked to community advocacy on arranging and environmental concerns, though not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Occasions article about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how people today from quite various Experienced backgrounds can find them selves aligned in these kinds of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some reports spell their names, became synonymous With all the Sutton Strand circumstance.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website within the sea Irish Instances protection emphasised, underlining The weird lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by means of midsection-higher drinking water all through a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Periods and René Collier waded via waistline-significant h2o throughout a storm to photograph the location Irish Situations are phrases that appeared repeatedly in coverage, reflecting equally the Actual physical truth of the coastline as well as the symbolic character on the act. For supporters with the plaintiffs, these steps shown determination; for critics, they illustrated whatever they see being an abnormal solution.
Given that the High Court proceedings continue, the outcome remains unsure. The court docket will have to identify whether or not the wall as crafted complies with scheduling authorization and irrespective of whether any encroachment right into a Exclusive Place of Conservation has transpired. The legal arguments are complicated, involving interpretation of maps, tidal information, and planning conditions. Yet the human ingredient stays central: neighbours who need to Reside together with one another extended after the authorized fees happen to be compensated.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing about building works at the internet site on Dublin Street, Sutton, nevertheless the implications of the situation lengthen beyond that tackle. For planners, developers, and inhabitants alike, the dispute serves as being a reminder of the necessity of clarity in arranging permissions and sensitivity in coastal improvement. In addition it underscores how speedily a local disagreement can escalate when basic issues for example environmental security and home legal rights are perceived to be at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand stays a location of organic natural beauty and contested boundaries. The wall in the centre with the dispute stands partly constructed, a Bodily manifestation of unresolved lawful questions. No matter whether it will in the end be altered, taken out, or done as prepared will depend on the court’s findings. Until finally then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their versions will probable go on to look in headlines, linked indelibly to Probably the most carefully watched arranging disputes in north Dublin lately.